COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTIONING OF WAKEBOARDING WORLDWIDE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/sports-education/2025-1-3

Keywords:

non-Olympic sports, wakeboarding, management, organization, infrastructure, international experience

Abstract

Introduction. Wakeboarding, as an extreme water sport, is gaining increasing popularity in various parts of the world. In different regions, the development of wakeboarding is shaped by cultural traditions, natural conditions, levels of infrastructure, and support from both the government and the private sector. The challenge lies in the lack of a comprehensive analysis of wakeboarding development in both well-established and less-prominent regions for this sport. Research Objective. To explore the features of wakeboarding development and functioning across countries in North and South America, Europe, Australia, and Asia, considering the organizational structure, infrastructure, financing, and popularity of the sport in different regions. Research Methods. The study employed an analysis of specialized scientific literature and internet data, comparative analysis, systematization, and generalization. Results. In the United States, wakeboarding enjoys high popularity due to its well-developed infrastructure, government support through Olympic programs, and active involvement of clubs and schools, such as the Orlando Watersports Complex. A similar situation is observed in Canada, where more emphasis is placed on natural water bodies like Okanagan Lake. In South America, particularly in Brazil, wakeboarding is commercially oriented. Clubs such as Naga Cable Park play a crucial role in attracting athletes and organizing competitions. In Australia, wakeboarding thrives with the support of federations like Wakeboard Australia and numerous clubs. The popularity of cable wakeboarding is linked to government backing. Australia also exemplifies the effective use of state funding to support young athletes. European countries demonstrate a high level of wakeboarding organization, especially in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Italy. For instance, Germany actively utilizes natural resources for cable wakeboarding development, while France stands out with government support through specific federation programs like FFSNW. Asia is at an early stage of wakeboarding development, yet Thailand, Japan, and the Philippines show significant progress. Thailand boasts one of the most advanced infrastructures in the region, while Japan emphasizes supporting young athletes through government programs. The study highlights the role of state support and private investments in popularizing wakeboarding, as well as the influence of climatic and geographical factors. Conclusion. Wakeboarding worldwide exhibits universal characteristics, but its popularity and organization significantly depend on local conditions. The sport is most developed in the United States, Europe, and Australia, where robust infrastructure, active federation and government support, and high competition participation levels exist. Asia demonstrates rapid growth in wakeboarding popularity, driven by the development of modern wake parks, particularly in Thailand and Japan. Emphasis is placed on the integration of recreational activities with professional sports, which ensures the inclusion of diverse social groups in the sport.

References

1. Долбишева Н. Розвиток неолімпійського спорту в міжнародному спортивному русі як автономії в період новітньої історії. Спортивний вісник Придніпров’я. 2021. № 3. С. 26–35. DOI: 10.32540/2071–1476–2021–3–026.

2. Імас Є., Ратніков Д., Андрєєва О. Розвиток спортивної інфраструктури як чинник залучення різних груп населення до оздоровчо-рекреаційної рухової активності. Теорія і методика фізичного виховання і спорту. 2022. № 4. С. 27–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32652/tmfvs.2022.4.27–30.

3. Когут І., Маринич В., Шитікова Є. Організаційно-методичне забезпечення функціонування спортивно-технічних видів спорту в Україні. Теорія і методика фізичного виховання і спорту. 2020. № 3. С. 70–73. https://doi.org/10.32652/tmfvs.2020.3.70–73.

4. Кропивницька Т., Макаренко О. Зарубіжний досвід функціонування неолімпійського спорту (на прикладі Німеччини). Теорія і методика фізичного виховання і спорту. 2022. № 2. С. 76–83. https://doi.org/10.32652/tmfvs.2022.2.76–83.

5. Куницька А.О., Шинкарук О.А. Порівняльний аналіз розвитку вейкбордингу в різних країнах світу. Молодь та олімпійський рух : зб. тез доп. VІХ Міжнар. конф. молодих вчених, м. Київ, черв. 2023 р. Київ : НУФВСУ. 2023. С. 25–26. URL: https://uni–sport.edu.ua/sites/default/files/vseDocumenti/zbirnyk_tez_molod_hvi_zhovt–lyst_23_7_1.pdf.

6. Пономаренко А., Шинкарук О. Особливості розвитку вейкбордингу в Німеччині. Молодь та олімпійський рух : зб. тез доп. XIV Міжнар. конф. молодих вчених, м. Київ, 19 трав. 2021. Київ : НУФВСУ, 2021. С. 35–36. URL: https://uni–sport.edu.ua/sites/default/files/konferencya/molod_xiv_zbirnyk_traven_2021.pdf.

7. Шинкарук О., Пономаренко А. Тенденції розвитку та функціонування вейкбордингу в країнах Європи. Фізична культура, спорт та здоров’я нації. 2021. № 11. С. 232–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31652/2071–5285–2021–11(30)–232–240.

8. Шинкарук О., Куницька А. Порівняльний аналіз розвитку вейкбордингу в різних країнах світу та основні тенденції його популяризації. Актуальні проблеми фізичного виховання та методики спортивного тренування. 2024. № 2. С. 87–100. https://doi.org/10.31652/3041-2463-2024-2-8.

9. British water ski & wakeboard. URL: https://www.bwsw.org.uk/membership.

10. Word Wake Association. URL: https://www.thewwa.com/.

11. Brazilian Water Ski and Wakeboard Confederation. URL: http://www.cbeaw.com.br/.

12. Brown C.J., Jewell D.P. Exploring the experiences of professional wakeboarders: A qualitative study. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2023. No 45 (S1). S. 98–99.

13. Canadian Parks, Recreation and Sport Infrastructure. URL: https://cpra.ca/canadian–parks–recreation–and–sport–infrastructure–data–base/.

14. Chinese Waterski, Underwater and Powerboat Association (CSUPF). URL: http://www.csupf.com/.

15. Cortese Garrett. The Future of Wakeboarding: A Look Ahead. Wakeboarding Magazine. 2018. URL: https://www.wakeboardingmag.com/story/features/future–wakeboarding–look–ahead/.

16. Davis L. Environmental sustainability in Australian cable wakeboarding. Environmental Sports Studies Journal. 2020. № 2. P. 12–20.

17. Deutscher Wasserski – und Wakeboardverband (DWWV). URL: https://www.dwwv.de/verband.

18. Dowling F. Waterski and wakeboard tourism: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Sport & Tourism. 2022. No 25 (1). P. 59–75.

19. Dunn R. Performance appraisal in the sport of wakeboarding. Journal of Sport & Tourism. 2018. No 22 (2). P. 171–190.

20. Federación Española de Esquí Náutico y Wakeboard. URL: http://www.feew.es/.

21. Fédération Française de Ski Nautique et de Wakeboard. URL: https://www.ffsnw.fr/.

22. Federazione Italiana Sci Nautico e Wakeboard. URL: http://www.scinautico.com/.

23. Garcia L. Age Recommendations for Starting Wakeboarding. Sports Medicine Journal. 2015. № 22 (5). С. 498–505.

24. Gatz M.A., Kerstetter D.L. Youth development outcomes in wakeboarding programs: A qualitative study. Journal of Experiential Education. 2023. P. 1–16.

25. Grant Daniel. Wakeboarding Takes on a New Look. The New York Times. 2021. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/06/sports/wakeboarding–takes–on–a–new–look.html.

26. Haley M. Infrastructure development in wakeboarding sports: A comparative study. Sports Development Journal. 2020. № 3. P. 45–55.

27. Hill M.A., Beal B. Wakeboarding and positive youth development: A systematic review. Journal of Youth Development. 2023. No 18 (1) P. 89–108.

28. IWWF Athletes/Officials without Federation. URL: https://iwwf.sport/.

29. Jamaican Water Ski Association. URL: https://ems.iwwf.sport/Federation/Details/.

30. Japan Waterski & Wakeboard Federation. URL: http://jwsa.jp/.

31. Johnson R. National Sports Organizations and Their Role in Sport Development. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2016. № 51 (2). С. 174–189.

32. Lawrence J. Youth engagement in cable wakeboarding in the UK. Journal of Recreational Sports. 2021. № 5. P. 23–29.

33. Lee S. Participation of Asian Countries in International Wakeboarding Competitions. Journal of Asian Sport Studies. 2020. № 18 (2). С. 223–237.

34. Müller T. Wakeboarding in Europe: Development and Infrastructure. European Journal of Sports Science. 2017. № 29 (3). С. 312–325.

35. Nguyen T. Impact of tourism on water sports development in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Sports Studies. 2019. № 7. P. 67–75.

36. Perry Shawn. Wakeboarding in the 21st Century: A Brief Overview. Sports Aspire. 2021. URL: https://sportsaspire.com/wakeboarding–in–21st–century–brief–overview.

37. Polski Zwiazek Motorowodny i Narciarstwa Wodnego. URL: http://www.motorowodniacy.org/.

38. Rodriguez P. Wakeboarding and local tourism in Brazil. South American Sports Review. 2022. № 4. P. 35–42.

39. Smith J. Growth of Water Sports in Southeast Asia. Journal of Sport Management. 2018. № 32 (4). С. 456–470.

40. Tanaka H. Government Support for Wakeboarding in Japan. Asian Journal of Sports Studies. 2019. № 15 (1). С. 88–102.

41. Tanaka K. Age-related training patterns in Japanese wakeboarding. Journal of Asian Sports Science. 2021. № 6. P. 49–56.

42. The Development of Wakeboarding in the UK: A Case Study of a New Sport. URL: https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/187957261/UnivBath_PhD_2010_A_McGillivray.pdf.

43. The European sports charter. URL: http://www.sportdevelopmeiit.org.Uk/The_European_Sports_Charter.pdf#search–European%20sports%20charter’/16804c9dbb.

44. USA Waterski and Wake Sports. URL: https://www.usawaterski.org.

45. Water Ski and Wakeboard Canada. URL: https://wswc.ca/.

46. Waterski and Wakeboard Australia. URL: http://www.awwf.com.au.

47. Williams D. Dominance of Western Athletes in Wakeboarding Championships. Global Sports Review. 2014. № 10 (3). С. 145–159.

Published

2025-06-04

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTIONING OF WAKEBOARDING WORLDWIDE. (2025). Спорт. Освіта. Здоров’я, 1, 14-20. https://doi.org/10.32782/sports-education/2025-1-3